|
所在平台: Udemy |
课程主页: https://www.udemy.com/course/the-science-of-healing/
课程评论：没有评论
课程名称：科学家的视角 > 治愈科学/灵气/触摸 概述：本课程探讨“治愈背后的科学”，并揭示了治愈实际上具有真实的生理和健康效果的强大科学证据。触摸治愈的技巧自人类诞生以来就已经存在，但这一能力在许多文化中逐渐丧失，因此需要重新建立联系。尽管一些人已经通过代际传承保留了这一技能，其他人则通过个人探索发现治愈的方式，而更多的人则需要通过灵性实践（例如学习灵气）来重拾这一能力。 课程中，作者分享了自己帮助众多人克服心理、情感、疼痛或身体问题的经验，并坚信其效果超过安慰剂的影响。尽管“治愈技术”是古老的，但灵气作为一种新兴的学科，常常受到现代医学的质疑。课程探讨了治愈者自梅斯梅尔时代以来的努力，如何寻求对其实践的科学验证，同时分析科学家、治愈者及其他相关方（如教会）在这些交流中的行为。 灵气因其易于学习而受到广泛欢迎。本课程还讨论了有关“手法治愈”的研究如何进行、验证，但这些研究往往缺乏重复性，这是科学接受新理念的基本要求。课程指出，虽然有些科学家声称“没有证据”，但实际上是证据不足且缺乏大型试验。作者认为，政府应在这一领域提供必要的研究资金，虽然这些技术无法获得专利利益，但成功的研究将为医疗节省开支。 总之，本课程旨在提供关于治愈科学及其验证过程的全面视角，促使学员重新审视和理解手法治愈术的价值及其潜力。
This course looks at the 'science behind healing' (yes, believe it or not there is a considerable amount of scientific evidence that 'healing' has real physiological and well-being effects). Hands-on Healing has probably been around since humans first graced this earth (if not even before that) and healing through touch is a given ability for us all, though culturally this ability is lost and therefore requires a reconnection. For some people it is still passed down through the generations, others find their own way to healing but for the rest of us we usually need to reconnect to this ability through a spiritual practice (like learning Reiki for example). Although 'healing techniques' are ancient Reiki itself , is a relatively new disciplineSince the birth of ‘science', healing techniques have often annoyed the eminent physicians of the day who often feel they have a monopoly on ‘healing' and thus they call upon ‘science' and scientists to label all the other healers as ‘charlatans' (I must confess that I used to be one of those scientists!)So this short course seeks to make some sense of 'hands-on' healing, Therapeutic Touch and Reiki. I have helped many people overcome mental, emotional, painful or physical conditions using a simple hands-on technique. So like all other healers, I believe the effects to be real and more than placebo. This, of course, is not enough for Newtonian Science which is not accepting of subjective experiences (nor it seems of positive patient outcomes) but rather it requires ‘proof' that something over and above our human imagination is at work here (and if it were just human imagination at work here, wouldn't it be good for science to discover how to 'switch on' this health benefit?)In the course, I take a look at what Healers have done since the time of Mesmer to get their practice validated ‘scientifically'. I also take a look at how scientists behave, how healers themselves behave and how the other interested party (the ‘church') behaves in these exchanges.Reiki has become very popular because it is so easily 'learnable' (unlike some other healing practices that require years of apprenticeship.I show how research has been done to both explain and validate ‘hands-on' healing but this research is rarely replicated. Replication is important for science as new ideas only get accepted when many studies start to confirm the same thing. Many of these studies would be relatively easy to replicate but few scientists seem curious, willing, or able to step up to the plate. (Some definitely feel the wrath of their profession when they do actually get involved in such studies).So when a scientist tells us "there is no evidence….." then they are wrong and in this course I present some of the evidence that is available. There is evidence, the problem is there not enough of it and no large scale trials have been done to my knowledge. As there is no profit in techniques that are not patentable, and large scale trials are expensive, I believe it is the role of Government in these situations to fund the necessary research. Although there is not profit to be made, there are certainly healthcare savings to made, so if the research is successful Government purse strings would be enhanced (although the pharmaceutical 'backhanders' would certainly disappear).
