|
所在平台: Udemy |
课程主页: https://www.udemy.com/course/the-roots-of-geopolitical-risk-moldova-and-the-baltics/
课程评论:没有评论
以下是关于“地缘政治风险的根源:摩尔多瓦与波罗的海国家”的Coursera课程总结: 本课程深入探讨了在2022年俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的背景下,摩尔多瓦和波罗的海国家(爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚、立陶宛)在地缘政治中面临的风险。课程旨在揭示克里姆林宫可能存在的长期计划,并解释为何这些国家的局势尤其令人担忧。 课程将追溯这三个波罗的海国家作为独立国家的演变历程,重点关注它们与苏联的历史联系以及当前与俄罗斯的关系。每个部分还将深入探讨构成国家身份核心的主题,包括: * **语言权:** 语言在国家认同中的作用以及可能存在的争议。 * **教育和公共服务:** 在转型过程中,教育和公共服务体系的演变及其对社会凝聚力的影响。 * **宗教自由:** 宗教在国家历史和当下扮演的角色。 * **不歧视的法律原则:** 民族、种族或其他群体不受歧视的法律保障。 课程特别指出,爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚和立陶宛已加入欧盟和北约。尽管北约成员身份可能构成一种威慑,但课程也考察了这些国家当前面临的具体挑战,例如爱沙尼亚遭受的俄罗斯支持的网络攻击,拉脱维亚国内大量的俄罗斯族少数群体及其可能存在的看法分歧,以及立陶宛因靠近俄罗斯飞地加里宁格勒和穿越其境内的铁路而产生的担忧。 此外,课程还将重点关注摩尔多瓦,这个既非欧盟也非北约成员的国家,其脆弱性尤为突出。课程将回顾摩尔多瓦在苏联解体后与俄罗斯发生的有限冲突,以及由此产生的、被俄罗斯控制的德涅斯特河沿岸地区(Transnistria)的现状。 通过对这些国家历史和当前局势的Examination,本课程旨在帮助学习者更深刻地理解本国和整个地区的动态,从而更好地应对当前全球地缘政治格局下不断涌现的新挑战。
If you are reading this page, you may be curious why there is a new Udemy course focusing on these particular countries. (Or perhaps you landed here by mistake, in which case, please read on nonetheless!). The reason is rather straightforward. Across our planet there are many latent, unresolved, historical conflicts which have become more acute due to recent events. The Russian invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24th, 2022, shocked many around the world. The boldness of the Russian invasion caused many to begin speculating whether other areas in the broader region might be on the list of the current regime in the Kremlin. A minority of observers was less surprised, seeing this move as the continuation of a long term plan which started with the capture of Crimea in 2014. But exactly what is that long term plan? That is a question which millions around the world have been pondering since the invasion, and the reason behind the creation of this course. Though the war in Ukraine has not gone as well as Russia may have wished, there is no sign of its willingness to abandon its original stated goal: the conquering of Ukrainian territory and the toppling of its current government. The apprehension of the societies in the countries neighbouring Russia is thus understandably high. Yet the countries in focus here are not so well known, at least in the West. This course aims to address this issue by tracing the evolution of each country as an independent nation, highlighting their specific historical links to the Soviet Union and current relations with Russia. Each Section also focuses on a particular topic at the heart of national identity: language rights, education and public services, religious freedom and legal principles of non-discrimination. All of these areas have undergone a dramatic transformation as the countries transitioned from being Soviet Socialist Republics to independent democracies.Three of them- the Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, are members of both the European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). As such, they are entitled to expect assistance from NATO in defending against an attack, from Russia or any other power. Just how much NATO constitutes a deterrence to Russia or other potential aggressors is unclear. Though there has not been any military aggression up to the time of course creation, Estonia has complained of cyberattacks which it has blamed on Russia. Estonia was actually the first nation to become subject to a cyberattack in 2007, something which created great turmoil for weeks and served as a wakeup call to other nations. We cover those events in the Section on Estonia. Latvia is equally if not more vulnerable, hosting the largest ethnic Russian minority in the region. The differing views of the ethnic Latvian and Russian communities regarding both past and present are on full display during our visit on Victory Day, which commemorates the victory of the Red Army over Nazi troops and the return of Latvia to the Soviet sphere. Lithuania may have less of a demographic issue, but its proximity to Kaliningrad (a Russian enclave captured from Germany during World War Two) and the railway line which runs through its territory give enough reasons for concern. Finally, Moldova, a member of neither the EU nor NATO, feels particularly vulnerable. It fought a limited war with Russia in the aftermath of the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The resulting ceasefire left Moldova with a sliver of Russian-controlled land sandwiched between it and Urkaine. In the Section on Moldova we pay a visit to this area, the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, or Transnistria for short.Examination of both the history and current state of affairs will help the student/fellow observer/traveller to better appreciate the dynamics both inside each country as well as in the region as a whole. Such greater appreciation may go some way in addressing the new geopolitical challenges facing humanity in this recent attempt to forge a new "new world order." Everyone on the planet has a stake in the further developments in these increasingly volatile regions.