|
所在平台: Udemy |
课程主页: https://www.udemy.com/course/the-kovel-accountant/
课程评论:没有评论
课程名称:Kovel会计师 课程概述:1961年的洋基队在球队历史上占有特殊地位,在我看来,他们是乔·迪马乔与德里克·基特之间唯一真正卓越的洋基队。米奇·曼特尔就像是索福克勒斯戏剧中的英雄,他本可以打破所有进攻记录,但由于一些悲剧性的缺陷,他未能完全发挥潜力。然而,即使在状态不佳的情况下,他依然在场上遥遥领先。队友罗杰·玛里斯虽然只有两三年的辉煌表现,但那几年的表现却极其出色。这支洋基队还拥有名人堂球员尤基·贝拉(曾是我的邻居)和怀特·福特,他们作为球队的补充角色,展现了这一球队的深厚实力。如果在1961年12月,朦胧的米奇·曼特尔翻阅律师或会计师的行业期刊,他可能会在分类广告和讣告之前发现一篇关于一个相对不为人知的第二巡回法庭案件的文章:美国诉Kovel案。尽管年复一年,各种法院和法规对这一裁决有所削弱,但这一案例依然坚固,它扩展了律师-客户特权至会计师或其他财务专业人士。简单来说,任何被视为特权的律师与纳税人之间的通信,如果是在“联邦授权的税务从业人员”与纳税人之间进行的,也将被认为是特权的。如果你认为这不算什么,那你可能从未经历过审计。 在本次讲座中,我将深入探讨Kovel案件及其协议,并讨论促成这些协议的案例。内容包括: - Kovel会计师概念如何增强律师-客户特权,相比于传统的会计师-客户关系? - 在Kovel协议中使用原会计师可能带来的潜在风险是什么? - 原会计师和Kovel会计师的角色差异如何影响涉及IRS审查的案件结果? - 客户为何可能抵制聘请新会计师的建议,律师应如何有效应对这些顾虑? - Kovel协议对纳税人与其会计师之间的沟通保密性有何影响? - Kovel案件如何展示在税务问题中理解律师-客户特权局限性的重要性? - 律师应采取哪些步骤确保Kovel协议得以妥善执行,保护客户的利益? - 哪些情况下第7525节提供的特权可能受到挑战,如何减轻这些挑战? - 工作产品原则如何与Kovel会计师相关,提供了什么保护? - 考虑到会计师-纳税人特权的狭窄范围,纳税人如何保护与会计师的通信? - Kovel会计师框架与其他整合法律与财务建议的方法相比如何? - 从Kovel案件中可以学到哪些关于法律义务与财务实践中保密需求之间平衡的教训? 通过本课程,学员将深入理解Kovel案例的影响及其在税务事务中的应用。
The 1961 Yankees occupy a special place in team history because, in my humble opinion, they were the only truly transcendent Yankee team between Joe DiMaggio and Derek Jeter. Mickey Mantle could have been a hero in a Sophocles play. He could have easily broken every offensive record in the book, but a tragic flaw, or rather flaws, kept him from his full potential. Yet, even at half speed, he ran laps around everybody else. Fellow outfielder Roger Maris really only had two or three good years, but what years they were. This Yankee team also featured Hall of Famers Yogi Berra (at one time, my next-door neighbor) and Whitey Ford. These guys were essentially complementary players on that squad, which should tell you something.If a bleary-eyed Mickey Mantle would have opened a lawyer or accountant trade journal in December of 1961 and flipped towards the back, just before the classifieds and obituaries, he may have found a write-up about a rather obscure Second Circuit case: United States v. Kovel. Various courts and codes have whittled away at this decision over the years, but it still stands firm as a case that can extend the attorney-client privilege to an accountant or other financial professional. Very simply, any communication between an attorney and a taxpayer that is deemed privileged under the attorney-client privilege will also be deemed privileged if it is between a "federally authorized tax practitioner" and a taxpayer. If you think that's not a big deal, you've probably never been audited.In this presentation, I'll do a deep-dive into the Kovel case along with Kovel agreements and discuss the case that gave rise to them.Topics include:How does the Kovel accountant concept enhance the attorney-client privilege compared to traditional accountant-client relationships?What are the potential risks associated with using an original accountant in the context of a Kovel agreement?In what ways can the distinction between the roles of the original accountant and the Kovel accountant affect the outcome of a case involving IRS scrutiny?Why might a client resist the recommendation to hire a new accountant, and how can attorneys effectively address these concerns?Discuss the implications of the Kovel agreement on the confidentiality of communications between a taxpayer and their accountant.How does the Kovel case illustrate the importance of understanding the limitations of the attorney-client privilege in tax matters?What steps should an attorney take to ensure that a Kovel agreement is properly executed and protects the client's interests?In what scenarios might the privilege provided by Section 7525 be challenged, and what can be done to mitigate these challenges?How does the work-product doctrine relate to the Kovel accountant, and what protections does it offer?Considering the narrow scope of the accountant-taxpayer privilege, how can taxpayers safeguard their communications with their accountants?How does the Kovel accountant framework compare to other methods of integrating legal and financial advice in tax matters?What lessons can be learned from the Kovel case regarding the balance between legal obligations and the need for confidentiality in financial practices?