|
所在平台: Udemy |
课程主页: https://www.udemy.com/course/nft-investing-for-prudent-investors-sam-ghosh/
课程评论：没有评论
课程名称：谨慎投资者的NFT投资 课程概述：截至2022年4月23日，本课程已经更新，添加了NFT铸造系统的GitHub链接。如果您对技术感兴趣，可以下载项目并尝试铸造NFT，链接位于第4部分：第9讲 - “是否可能有多个NFT与相同资产？”2019年，NFT（非同质化代币）的年度交易量仅为2500万美元，而到2021年这一数字达到了177亿美元，增长超过700倍。NFT的平均价格也从仅15美元涨至超过800美元。然而，在这股热潮背后，对NFT及其交易本质存在许多误解，形成了两派不同的观点：一派主张NFT将颠覆创作者经济，另一派则认为整个NFT系统存在欺诈，类比于郁金香泡沫。实际上，真相往往更为复杂。尽管NFT交易价格的迅速上涨显示出市场受炒作驱动，但NFT背后的基础技术在各个行业中具有巨大的潜力。该课程专为希望将NFT纳入投资组合的投资者设计，强调谨慎与尽职调查，不鼓励冲动决策。课程不将NFT视为革命性突破或欺诈工具，而是另外一种需要从收益、风险及责任角度进行理解的潜在投资类型。
Update: 23rd April 2022.Added GitHub repo link for the NFT Minting System. If you are technically inclined, you can download the project and give minting NFTs a try. The link is available in Section4: lecture 9 - "Is it possible to have multiple NFTs with the same asset?"From merely 25 million USD in 2019 annual trading volume of NFT or Non-fungible tokens reached 17.7 billion in 2021.. which is more than 700 times in 2 years….and the average price of NFTs increased from merely 15 us dollars to more than 800 us dollars.But amid all this exuberance, there are a lot of misconceptions about the very nature of NFTs and NFT transactions.These misconceptions have created two distinct groups - advocates of NFTs who claim that NFTs are going to disrupt the creator economy..another group who think that the whole NFT system is fraudulent and compare it with the Tulip bubble.As in the case of all things - the truth is somewhere in between and much more complex.While the rapid increase in the trade price of NFTs points to a market driven by hype, the fundamental technology behind NFTs has tremendous potential in various industries.Now, this course is designed for investors who are interested in adding NFTs to their portfolios but do not want to take impulsive decisions and want to perform proper due diligence. This course does not consider NFTs as a groundbreaking revolution nor as instruments to carry out fraud. This course considers NFTs as another type of prospective investment which needs to be understood not only from a return perspective but also from a risks and liability perspective.
