|
所在平台: Udemy |
课程主页: https://www.udemy.com/course/how-to-sub-system-hazard-analysis-with-mil-std-882e/
课程评论：没有评论
好的，以下是关于Coursera课程“How To: Sub System Hazard Analysis (per Standard)”的中文课程内容摘要： 本课程是“Safety Artisan”系列的一部分，由Simon主讲，专注于系统安全。本期内容聚焦于“子系统危险分析”（Sub-System Hazard Analysis），这是军用标准882E中的任务204。 课程将介绍子系统危险分析的三个主要目的： 1. 验证合规性 2. 识别新的危险 3. 推荐必要的控制措施（针对危险和风险） 课程内容将包括： * 任务描述（共六页） * 报告相关内容（共两页） * 合同签订相关内容（共一页） * 讲师的个人见解和补充（旨在增加课程的价值） 讲师特别指出，“子系统”和“系统”危险分析的任务非常相似，几乎是相同的，但存在一些细微差别。在课程设计中，这些差异点通过黄色高亮（在本摘要中为下划线）来强调，以便学习者在观看完子系统（204）和系统（205）危险分析的课程后，能清晰理解其重要性。
IntroductionHello, everyone, and welcome to the Safety Artisan, where you will find professional, pragmatic, and impartial instruction on all things system safety. I'm Simon - your host for today, as always and it's the fourth of April 22. With everything happening in the world, I hope this video finds you safe and well.Sub-System Hazard AnalysisLet's move straight on to what we're going to be doing. We're going to be talking today about subsystem hazard analysis and this is task 204 under the military standard 882E. Previously we've done 201, which was preliminary hazard identification, 202, which is preliminary hazard analysis, and 203, which is safety requirements hazard analysis. And with task 204 and task 205, which is system has analysis, we're now getting stuck into particular systems that we're thinking about, whether physical or intangible. We're thinking about the system under consideration and I'm getting into that analysis.Topics for this SessionSo, the topics that we're going to cover today, I've got a little preamble to set things in perspective. We then get into the three purposes of task 204. First, to verify compliance. Secondly, to identify new hazards. And thirdly, to recommend necessary actions. In fact, that would be recommended control measures for hazards and risks. We've got six slides of task description, a couple of slides on reporting, one on contracting, and then a few slides on some commentary where I put in my tuppence worth and I'll hopefully add some value to the basic bones of the standard. It's worth saying that you'll notice that subsystem ishighlighted in yellow and the reason for that is that the subsystem and system hazard analysis tasks are very, very similar. They're identical except for certain passages and I've highlighted those in yellow. Normally I use a yellow highlighter to emphasize something I want to talk about. This time around, I'm using underlining for that and the yellow is showing you what these are different for subsystem analysis as opposed to system analysis. And when you've watched both sessions on 204 and 205, I think you'll see the significance of why I've done that.
