Grant Writing: Avoiding Rejection

所在平台: Udemy

课程主页: https://www.udemy.com/course/grant-writing-avoiding-rejection/

课程评论:没有评论

第一个写评论        关注课程

课程简介

Coursera 课程《基金写作:避免拒绝》旨在从独特视角出发,帮助学员大幅提高基金申请成功率,克服高达 50-97% 的拒绝率。通过深入剖析基金申请被拒的常见及不常见原因,本课程将彻底改变你撰写申请书的思维方式,并教授你如何规避错误,写出令人信服且无懈可击的申请。 课程将指导你掌握撰写基金申请的各项最佳实践,包括支持理由、资源论证以及评估计划等关键部分,最终目标是让你能够撰写出极具竞争力、让资助方难以找到拒绝理由的申请书。 本课程的一大独特之处在于,授课教授 James Smith 博士本人曾担任多个资助评审委员会主席,直接负责基金的审批决策。他拥有丰富的实际评审经验,并以其清晰易懂、循序渐进的教学风格广受好评。 **亮点及适用人群:** * **核心亮点:** 教授如何撰写成功的基金申请,而非被拒绝的申请;让申请能获得资助。 * **教授专业背景:** James Smith 博士是资助评审委员会主席,了解基金决策内幕。 * **教学风格:** 易于理解,语速适中,论述详尽,注重实践,便于笔记。 * **目标学员:** * 想要学习如何成功撰写基金申请的个人。 * 希望获得基金资助的学术界人士(教授、讲师、副教授)。 * 为 501.C3、非营利组织或中小型企业申请基金的人员。 * 希望撰写难以被资助方拒绝的基金申请者。 * 进行募资活动,希望专业、有效地定向努力的人员。 **课程结构(四大模块):** * **模块一:申请流程中的问题** * 探讨申请阶段的决策如何影响资助方的判断。 * 分析资助方对申请者在资格、信息完整性、遵循指南等方面的评估。 * 重点讲解评审者如何评估细节、项目的可行性和时间表,指出这些是早期被拒的主要原因。 * **模块二:申请书的审议要素** * 深入剖析申请书中受到严密审查的具体构成部分。 * 教授如何应对弱化的支持理由、不明确的目标、预算问题、缺乏外部合作以及方法论中的关键错误。 * 强调如何清晰传达预期成果,并确保与资助方目标保持一致。 * 指出这些问题是导致申请被拒的常见原因。 * **模块三:申请团队的问题** * 关注申请团队(申请人及其合作者)在申请中的表现。 * 讨论如何展示团队的过往业绩,如何在申请中融入个人观点但不显偏颇。 * 强调如何将基金申请与团队的专业能力相结合,以及为何团队成员的合理性与项目同等重要。 * **模块四:概念性问题** * 聚焦于基金申请的核心“概念”,即向资助方推销的价值。 * 探讨如何确保证明的创新性、影响力、实际效益以及可行性。 * 分析这些关键领域中常见的不足之处,帮助学员在撰写和审阅申请时预见评审者的负面看法。 **总结:** 本课程将通过清晰易懂的内容,教授学员不仅如何撰写出有效的基金申请,更能提供对基金写作错误和疏漏的全面理解,解释为何会出现这些错误,以及最重要的是,如何有效避免这些错误,从而大幅提升基金申请的成功率。

课程评论(0条)

课程详情

This course is designed from a completely fresh and unique perspective. Because your grant application likely has between a 50-97% chance of being rejected, this course is specifically designed to ensure you have the skills to make sure that your application sits in the percentage that it is funded!This course has been built from the ground up to help you to avoid both the common and less common mistakes in grant writing. It will completely change the way in which you approach each element of your grant funding application.By ensuring you have a full understanding of how and why proposals are reject, you will approach the different sections of your grant application in a different way, allowinf you to mitigate flaws and errors and write proposals that are convincing and flawless. Importantly it gives you best practice for how to write each section of your grant, including your case for support, your justification of resources, and your plans for evaluation.Most importantly, it will teach you how to craft your proposal to ensure it is highly competitive, so that the funder will find it extremely hard to find a reason to reject it.A unique aspect of this course is you will learn about how to write an effective grant application from an instructor (Professor James Smith) who actually Chairs a number of funding panels and who is actually responsible for making grant funding decisionsYour instructor, Professor James Smith, PhD, is an established and popular instructor on the Udemy platform. Feedback that he has received from Udemy students includes;"Very easy to understand and the instructor spoke slowly enough that I could let the information sink in" - KW"Very informative and thorough. Getting ready to take the next course. The assignments with the instructor's example following were very helpful" - KR"Very helpful information from a well-qualified Professor. Concisely presented in a format that facilitates easy notetaking" - BDPThis course is ideal for you if;You want to learn how to write successful grants, rather than applications that are rejected.You are an academic or Lecturer or Assistant Professor who wants to secure grant fundingYou are grant writing for a 501.C3, a non-profit or a small/medium sized enterpriseYou want to craft a grant proposal that is difficult for the funder to rejectYou are undertaking fundraising and want to target your effort effectively and professionallyIn this course you will develop an advanced understanding of how to approach and write a professional grant application that lacks any serious faults.This course is split into four modules. Module 1 is called Issues with the Application Process and it covers how the decisions you make at the application stage can influence how the funder makes decisions on your project. The funder will assess your application against a number of criteria including eligibility, complete information and adherence to grant guidelines. The reviewers that are appointed by the funder will assess elements such as attention detail and the feasibility and timeline of a project. These are all areas where the funder will be assessing your ability to comply with the requirements that they have set out, and these are the most common areas where a grant is rejected at a very early stage in the review process.In Module 2, we will actually deal with the specific elements of your proposal that are highly scrutinised during the grant application process. These specific elements of your proposal are tested and assessed for weaknesses and issues and we will cover how the reviewers will use the information that you provide to make a recommendation. This module covers elements like a weak case for support, poor objectives, budgetary issues, lack of external partnerships and critical errors in the approach or methodology. We will also cover poor communication of outcomes and ensuring full alignment to what the funder wants. If you have already completed a grant application and unfortunately received a rejection decision then you will recognise and appreciate that these issues cover some of the most common reasons for why reviewers will support rejection an application.In Module 3, we cover the main issues that are raised in terms of the application team i.e. you and your colleagues or collaborators who are writing and submitting the application. We will cover issues like your track record, how you can impart your own views in the application without it appearing biased, how you can align your grant applications to your expertise and why its important not to stack applicants on your grant proposal. All of these areas fall under issues with the applicants and since the applicants are assessed with an equal weighting to the project or proposal itself, it's important for the application team to be properly justified and defined.In the final module (Module 4), we cover about conceptual issues in your grant. The grant concept is what you are trying to sell to the funder. The concept is something that is new, something that can actually demonstrate impact or real world change, something that is good value for money and something that can actually be achieved. In this module we cover the common issues in all of these areas so that when you write and review your application, you'll be able to identify how or what the reviewers will see as negative points.In summary, this course contains accessible and comprehensive classes which will train you not only to craft an effective application, but will give you a full understanding of where grant writing mistakes and faults can occur, why funders will reject an application because of these mistakes and most importantly, how you can avoid them.

课程标签

0人关注该课程

主题相关的课程