|
所在平台: Udemy |
课程主页: https://www.udemy.com/course/critical-thinking-academy/
课程评论:没有评论
《批判性思维学院:提升意识与智力》课程总结 本课程旨在帮助学习者轻松掌握批判性思维的基础知识,这是一项至关重要的技能,能够有效防止被欺骗或误导。课程将教授如何识别政客和推销人员惯用的逻辑谬误,并提供多个包含逻辑谬误或其他批判性思维失败的实例,以指导学习者如何应对。 课程内容丰富,包括多种讲义(含免费书籍)和“批判性思维清单”。学习者可在极短时间内(约一小时视频和百余页讲义)完成课程。课程结构清晰,划分为多个模块。首个模块介绍批判性思维的基本概念并辅以实例。随后的每个模块均围绕特定主题及其相关断言展开,通过视频讲解,逐一剖析这些断言,运用批判性思维进行分析。 学习本课程将有助于提升思维敏锐度,对其生活中的各项决策(包括商业管理、投票、消费、健康、财务、婚姻、生活方式选择等)产生积极影响。 课程还通过分析一则对课程的负面评价,生动展示了逻辑谬误的运用。该评价声称课程“是制造阴谋论和气候变化否认论的借口”,并建议“在学习前先搜索讲师的资料”。课程对此进行了驳斥,强调课程并未“虚张声势”,而是真实地分析了气候变化议题的论点,以实现更理性的批判性思维。课程的“逻辑谬误”模块深入探讨了攻击性谬误如何歪曲批判性思维,并指出有些人利用此类谬误阻止他人接触相反的事实,而批判性思维恰恰要求审视问题的所有方面,包括质疑自身的信念。 此外,课程还澄清了“阴谋”的定义,并指出部分免费书籍提供了来自多个信誉良好来源的证据,证明阴谋并非虚构,且平均每秒就有约489个新阴谋出现。“理论”在科学中被称为“假说”,用于探索可观测事实的可能原因;而“阴谋”仅定义为两人或多人为进行不道德或非法之事而进行的对话。课程指出“否认”一词是一种贬低性的“人身攻击”谬误。 课程最后强调,虽然建议在了解讲师背景方面从众,但也提醒学习者不应因此阻止自己深入探究一个话题。事实本身不因讲述者而改变,应专注于事实而非个人。固步自封将错失发现的独特机会。每个观点都有其价值,包括学习者自身的观点。
Easily learn the basics of critical thinking.Every human needs these skills to keep from being cheated or fooled. Learn how to detect logical fallacies used by the best politicians and salesmen.Course includes several handouts, including several free books, plus the Critical Thinking Checklist. Multiple examples are given of logical fallacies or other failures in critical thinking, so that you will know how to respond. This course can easily be finished in one day with an hour of video and over a hundred pages of handouts.The course is divided into modules. The first introduces the basics of critical thinking and includes examples. Each subsequent module presents a topic and claims that have been made about that subject. Video lessons take those claims apart, piece by piece, and analyzes them using critical thinking.Take this course to sharpen your mind for everything you do in life. Critical thinking skills are essential with any of life's important decisions.Managing a business,Voting,Purchases,Health,Finances,Marriage,Lifestyle choices, andMuch, much more...EXAMPLE OF CRITICAL THINKING:One of the reviews for this course provides us with a perfect example of logical fallacies in use to argue against taking the course. Let's examine this student's comments to see how they stack up when put under the examination of critical thinking.The student remarked, "It is a pretense to position critical thinking fundamentals to deliver conspiracy theories and climate change denial. I would suggest people google the instructor prior to taking the course."Pretense? No, there is no "false show," here. This course and the discussions in it truly do analyze the arguments on the topics of climate change to achieve a more reasoned critical thinking. The second module ("Logical Fallacies") adds to this by providing an in-depth look at how critical thinking can become derailed by fallacies like the ones used in the comment. Sadly, some use such attack fallacies to get people not to look at opposing facts. Critical Thinking is all about examining all sides of an issue, rather than ignoring them. Critical Thinking demands that we question everything, including our own beliefs.The former student said, "...deliver conspiracy theories..." But what is a conspiracy? One of your free books provides evidence from numerous reputable sources that prove that conspiracies are, as the title says, "Dirt Ordinary." This is no fantasy, or kooky topic. In fact, there are at least 489 new conspiracies starting every second, on average, every day, all year long and every year. Theories are called by scientists, "hypotheses," and are used to explore the possible causes of observed, factual phenomena. A conspiracy is defined merely as a conversation between 2 or more people for the purpose of doing something unethical or illegal. Criminal selfishness is to the individual what conspiracy is to the group.The use of the term, "denial," is a pejorative, ad hominem attack, one of the logical fallacies about which you will learn more in the course.The former student recommended that, "...people google the instructor prior to taking the course." Knowledge is always a good thing, and I strongly concur with the former student's recommendation, but with one very potent caveat: Don't let anything you find out about any instructor dissuade you from investigating a topic more deeply. Facts are facts, no matter who says them. Judge the facts, not the personalities. Those who put on blinders will miss unique opportunities for discovery. Every viewpoint has value-even yours.