|
所在平台: Udemy |
课程主页: https://www.udemy.com/course/a-clear-logical-argument-guaranteed/
课程评论：没有评论
**Coursera 课程：确保清晰的逻辑论证 (A Clear Logical Argument Guaranteed)** 本课程由一位拥有近 40 年实际诉讼经验的资深律师兼法学教授讲授，旨在帮助学员掌握构建清晰、有逻辑的实用论证的方法。无论论证的复杂程度如何，该方法都适用，并被证明是可靠、严谨且近乎自动的。 **核心内容：** * **实用逻辑模板：** 课程将传授一种简单的自然语言逻辑模板，这是讲师在法庭上赢得辩论的关键。学员只需将推理过程套入此模板，即可生成清晰有力的论证。 * **五步法：** 构建逻辑论证只需遵循五个简单的步骤，无需学习大量传统的逻辑学理论和术语。 * **学术基础：** 该方法基于 Fred Sommers 和 George Englebretsen 教授的自然语言新三段论研究，并经过同行评审，具有坚实的学术基础。 * **实战检验：** 该逻辑模板已在真实的诉讼案件中得到多年验证，并被证明是有效的。 * **解决学习难题：** 纠正了传统逻辑学教学过于复杂、难以掌握的缺点，提供了一种更易于理解和实践的学习方式。 * **应用广泛：** 无论是为了支持自身观点还是反驳对方观点，该方法都能轻松胜任。 * **关键性技能：** 强调了掌握清晰逻辑论证能力对其他批判性思维能力的重要性。 **学习目标：** 学员将能够： * 快速、轻松地构建清晰、有逻辑的实用论证。 * 识别和解决论证中的逻辑缺陷。 * 在各种场合（包括学术和职业领域）有效地表达自己的观点。 **学习方法：** 课程强调实践，鼓励学员通过练习掌握这五个简单的步骤，并将这些步骤应用于各种论证场景。 **课程特色：** * **实用性强：** 直接教授可用于解决实际问题的技能。 * **易学易用：** 简化了逻辑学习过程，使之易于理解和运用。 * **效果显著：** 承诺能够“每次都”生成清晰的逻辑论证。 * **经验丰富：** 来自一位在实际领域拥有深厚积累的专业人士。
Welcome! As a trial and appellate attorney for nearly 40 years, my livelihood depends on constructing practical real-world winning arguments. Whether simple or complex, those arguments must be both logical and clear to my audience. And as an adjunct law professor for advanced argumentation, teaching students how to quickly and easily make such quality arguments is my mission. In this course, I would like to share with you how to use or teach the same simple natural language logic template that I rely upon in court to ensure that any argument is both logical and clear. I just fit the sentences of my reasoning within that logic template and out comes a logical and clear argument every time. It's fail-safe, rigorous, robust, and nearly automatic. The type, complexity, or subject matter of the reasoning does not matter-the logic template is universal. And if the reasoning cannot be made to fit within the structure, you know that the reasoning is not logical. Fortunately, you will NOT need to learn or teach about the typical long list of logical argument and reasoning curriculum topics. Just scratch them off your list of "need-to-know" to construct logical and clear arguments. There are just five simple steps to follow to complete the logic template. It is academically sound as an extension of the seminal work of Professors Fred Sommers and George Englebretsen in the natural language New Syllogistic and peer-reviewed (Oxford Journal articles). And it has been field tested for years in actual litigation. Of course, like improving any expertise, you will need to practice. But you only need to practice the same five simple steps for any argument. To the contrary, based on traditional curriculum, studies have shown that practical logical reasoning "is often ill understood and poorly deployed even among those in the upper tiers of our educational systems."(van Gelder, T., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Enhancing expertise in informal reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 142-152.) Hasn't the time come for learning and teaching how to make logical and clear arguments to stop being so complex and difficult? We have all been working at it harder than is really needed! The right tool makes all the difference. The focus of this course is narrow-how to easily construct practical clear logical arguments every time whether supporting your own position or attacking another position. That's it! While there is certainly more to critical thinking than constructing logical and clear arguments, without real competence in this one skill, the other important areas of critical thinking cannot overcome its absence. QUESTIONS ALWAYS WELCOME! Joseph
